- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:05:45 +0200
Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > I like the paired-elements proposal, much better than my earlier ideas > of being able to wrap <li></li> in idm. It gives you all the power of > idm while retaining a well-formed dom tree. However, it's not ideal. > The stuff in the range is no longer targetable with CSS, frex. We could > poke at CSS3 to have a new pseudo-element set for idm, but meh. How do > implementors feel about this? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Nov/0190.html </Daniel>
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 07:05:45 UTC