- From: Rikkert Koppes <rikkert@finalist.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:10:35 +0200
Ah Let me rephrase the proposal: replace "A disabled control can still match this pseudo-class; the states are orthogonal." with "A disabled control can still match this pseudo-class; the disabled and read-write states are orthogonal." current description could fool more people :) Regards, Rikkert Koppes Anne van Kesteren schreef: > Quoting Rikkert Koppes <rikkert at finalist.com>: > >> [...] A >> disabled control can still match this pseudo-class; the states are >> orthogonal. >> >> I believe the term "orthogonal" is incorrect here. >> > > :read-write is orthogonal to :disabled. That's correct. > > >
Received on Monday, 24 September 2007 06:10:35 UTC