- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:37:25 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Brady Eidson wrote: > > A SQLTransactionErrorCallback object has a single method: boolean > handleEvent(in SQLError error); > > This method is meant for both notifying of a failure in the transaction > as well as for deciding it's fate - should we commit what we have, or > just roll it back? However, there's one problem - how does the script > and it's SQLTransactionErrorCallback know which transaction is in > question? > > I propose we change SQLTransactionErrorCallback.handleEvent() to have > the same signature as the SQLStatementErrorCallback, which is: boolean > handleEvent(in SQLTransaction transaction, in SQLError error); Actually I specifically didn't include the transaction because I can't see what you could do with it. You know which transaction it is, it's the one to which you are passing the method. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 29 October 2007 15:37:25 UTC