- From: Krzysztof Żelechowski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:03:55 +0200
Dnia 22-10-2007, pon o godzinie 17:09 -0700, Michaeljohn Clement napisa?(a): > K?i?tof ?elechovski wrote: > > Also, if we agreed to that, this would be a workaround for a supposed > > deficiency of SQL. But the SQL committee does not recognize it as a > > deficiency; otherwise it would have been fixed by now. > > No, this is actually fixed for 15 years now. The SQL spec directly > addresses this need through the information schema, since SQL92. > > Every moderately complete SQL implementation I'm aware of also meets > this need, either through the means specified by the standard, or by > incompatible extensions, as is the general custom. Thanks. In that case let the manufacturers of the incompatible DBMS cater for that (provide a conformant implementation). It has nothing to do with HTML DOM. Chris
Received on Monday, 22 October 2007 23:03:55 UTC