- From: Dave Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:19:13 -0700
At 21:35 +0200 19/10/07, K?i?tof ?elechovski wrote: >This is asymmetric and it does not reflect the common usage: >intro-canto-canto-canto-coda. You get intro-canto-coda-canto-canto instead. >I have never encountered such a piece. >Best regards, >Chris I think Ian mis-spoke; loopEnd is where every loop ends except the *last*. So you get what you wanted. I have wondered whether it would be clearer if we called it loopFrom and loopTo, and had loopCount be the count of the *extra* plays, and loopNumber (or loopIndex) the current *extra* play. So if loopCount is 0, loopStart and loopEnd are irrelevant, and loopNumber will never exceed 0 either. (The same names with repeat instead of loop make equal semantic sense). Would this be easier to explain and document? > >-----Original Message----- >From: whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org >[mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Michael A. Puls II >Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:25 AM >To: Ian Hickson >Cc: whatwg at whatwg.org >Subject: Re: [whatwg] Audio(): loop() with 0 or negative value as argument > > >loopstart: gives the offset at which playback is to begin for every >playback iteration except the first. The default value is the same as >start. > >loopend: gives the offset at which playback is to end for every >playback iteration except the first. The default value is the same as >end. -- David Singer Apple/QuickTime
Received on Friday, 19 October 2007 15:19:13 UTC