- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:27:02 -0800
This is just off the top of my head so I'm certain that there are probably reasons why this wouldn't work, but could we not do something like, <link rel="edit put delete patch" href="http://example.org/foo" /> Edit indicates the purpose of the link, put, delete and patch indicate methods (in addition to GET). - James Ian Hickson wrote: > On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Martin Atkins wrote: >> What would be useful, though perhaps out of scope for HTML5, is a way to >> specify a *protocol*, rather than a response type, for a given link >> relation. Then you could specify that this is an AtomAPI endpoint, >> rather than that a GET request will return an atom+xml document. > > Would it make sense to use rel="" for this? >
Received on Monday, 5 November 2007 09:27:02 UTC