- From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 23:52:48 +0200
On 2007-05-24 02:45:44 +0200 Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2007, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > The chairman of the HTML WG asked that we stop discussing, that's why I > haven't been posting on that list. :-( Ok - I see. Yes it is true he did. > Note, though, that there are a number of ways to see what progress is being > made on the W3C HTML 5 specification; they are all listed at the top of the > spec, as required by teh W3C publication rules: > > > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/html5/spec/Overview.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8 > > So it's not like the progress has been hidden from the HTML working group. You have a point there. And especially with the thing you said above. >> On 2007-05-23 23:20:40 +0200 Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> replied to Julian: >> >>> If the spec I'm working on isn't that spec, then I'll stop working on > >>> it, and return to working on the spec with real-world relevance.) >> >> I think many would feel that the whole process would pretty much falls >> apart if this should happen. On the other side, it doesn't sound as if you >> are open to much debate. You better think about how you present this to the >> HTMLwg. No one likes to discuss under a Damocles sword. On the other side, >> it is just fair to say that there are some limites on what one can accept. >> But then again, the HTMLwg has been conveened pretty much because of WHATwg >> - so it would be a bit strange. > > I'm not really sure I understand what you mean here. I think I've been pretty > open about my position. I don't really understand what you want me to say or > do. No. Those thing I had in mind are probably not all that important ... I support the view that the spec must have a strong focus on ?real world relevance?. And I think I'll interpret what you said as a sign of your strong convictions about the way forward ... :-) -- leif
Received on Monday, 28 May 2007 14:52:48 UTC