- From: Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl>
- Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 08:34:12 +0200
At 16:42 +1200 UTC, on 2007-05-27, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: > On May 23, 2007, at 2:05 PM, Sander Tekelenburg wrote: [...] >> The argument for using file name extensions is that they can provide a >> clue as to what sort of file is being pointed to [...] > <http://urlx.org/google.com/0a8e8> is a URL without a suffix, which is > quite understandable, because the whole point of urlx.org is to make > short URLs. It redirects to a Google Cache URL ending in ".pdf", which > is quite understandable, because it's a cache of a PDF document. But > the cached version itself is HTML. Yeah, that's what I said in the next paragraph ;) -- Sander Tekelenburg The Web Repair Initiative: <http://webrepair.org/>
Received on Saturday, 26 May 2007 23:34:12 UTC