- From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 08:02:12 -0400
Nicholas Shanks wrote: > Various people have expressed opinions in favour of either one spec to > rule them all, or two specs for different audiences. Is not the simplest > solution to have two views upon the same spec? > > HTML 5, Full Version (User Agent Edition) > "<foo> is deprecated and should not be used, but you have to support it > anyway." > > HTML 5, Abridged Version (Web Author Edition) > "<foo> is deprecated and should not be used." > I think it would be better for the abridged version not to mention foo and other deprecated elements at all. > You can even have them at the same URL, with a pair of radio buttons to > toggle between them (which just toggles display: none on a class to hide > the unnecessary info: Now that's just evil. Each separate resource should have at least one URL. There may be one source document, but the views are different documents and should have different URLs. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo at metalab.unc.edu Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeaulait.org/books/javaio2/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596527500/ref=nosim/cafeaulaitA/
Received on Saturday, 26 May 2007 05:02:12 UTC