- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 02:33:22 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 25 May 2007, Sander wrote: > > In the current specs <dt>s and <dd>s are only grouped imlicitly. This > leaves us with a DOM where <dt>s and <dd>s that are not related in as > term&description share the same parent. I'd like to see a way to > seperate the 'siblings' from the 'cousins' in a more explicit way. > Something along the line of the <di> from the XHTML 2 specs > (http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/mod-list.html#edef_list_di). > > A <di> (to stick to that name) will enhance the logics of the DOM > structure and will give better hooks for layout and behaviour. I don't see how it will enhance the logics of the DOM structure. It would just introduce yet another way for authors to get the logic wrong, in fact. The meaning wouldn't change with <di>. As far as styling goes (the hooks for layout and behaviour), I would recommend asking the CSS working group to fix CSS. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 19:33:22 UTC