- From: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:16:25 +0200
Forgive my being nosy: which uses? a href="javascript:." is valid but it replaces the current document with a document parsed from the textual representation of the value returned from the script. In principle, you could do something to the page and replace it with a page that immediately goes back. While that would be acceptable, it would cause an uncomfortable flip of display. On the other hand, button onclick="javascript:." is invalid because the content attribute should contain the text of the script. Or should "javascript:" be treated as a label at the beginning of the inserted script? That would be weird. Best regards, Chris -----Original Message----- From: Maciej Stachowiak [mailto:mjs@apple.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 8:18 PM To: Kristof Zelechovski Cc: 'Ian Hickson'; judell at mv.com; whatwg at whatwg.org Subject: Re: [whatwg] password option for window.prompt? On May 22, 2007, at 12:47 AM, Kristof Zelechovski wrote: > And besides, the bookmarklet uses the javascript protocol, which, > IIRC, is > designed to produce a new document on the fly, not to modify the > current > one. On the contrary, many uses of the javascript: URI scheme in web pages are used to modify the current page. The code in a javascript: URI is executed in an existing scripting context. Regards, Maciej
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2007 12:16:25 UTC