- From: Alexey Feldgendler <alexey@feldgendler.ru>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 23:11:20 +0200
On Mon, 14 May 2007 22:29:57 +0200, Michel Fortin <michel.fortin at michelf.com> wrote: > I was pointing out a solution for the problem of separate HTTP requests > on a forum page. Used in conjunction with some previously-suggested > security attributes on <iframe>, it could do a pretty good sandbox for > use comments on a page. > > If you want the sandbox to degrade securely in older browsers, then this > is not a solution. Yes, I want the sandbox to degrade securely, as does any webmaster who might be going to allow some user-supplied scripting while relying on sandboxing for security. To cover its use cases, this feature must degrade securely. > But I don't think there's a nice solution to that anyway. This does degrade securely, doesn't require separate HTTP requests, and maintains human readability. http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2005-December/005301.html However, I admin that it's not quite ?nice? (as in ??sthetics?). -- Alexey Feldgendler <alexey at feldgendler.ru> [ICQ: 115226275] http://feldgendler.livejournal.com
Received on Monday, 14 May 2007 14:11:20 UTC