- From: Michel Fortin <michel.fortin@michelf.com>
- Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 08:50:52 -0400
Le 2007-05-04 ? 21:28, Sander Tekelenburg a ?crit : > I think I would agree with 1 through 3 (Michel Fortin's objects to > 3, but the > rationale he gives seems to only apply to 4. So I don't understand the > objection to 3. But perhaps I misunderstood.) The rationale for disliking 3 (conformance checkers warning about style="") was indeed not very clear in my previous email. So let me explain my thoughts a little more. I think style="" can be useful in a couple of cases. Not all style rules are reused: sometime they're used only once in the middle of a document in which case it has no real benefit and it just complicate things for the author to put the style in a separate stylesheet and work out a way to apply the style to the right element (class, id). Therefore, warning on all style attributes found in a document is a little too broad in my opinion: it's counterproductive for authors checking their documents, and it may just encourage people to blindly copy all their style rules to a stylesheet without giving in more thought. It may be a better idea for the conformance checker to parse style rules listed in the style attribute and warn only against those having a high risk of being problematic for accessibility. This later approach could have the benefit of being compatible with WYSIWYG-edited documents. In the eventuality a WYSIWYG editor was to output a style rule that compromise accessibility, I think it deserve to be flagged anyway. For instance: <span style="font-style:italic"> could be flagged, and <i> proposed as a replacement. WYSIWYG editors that italicise with a style rule are most probably in the wrong anyway since whatever is meant by italics, it's likely to be relevant to the understanding of the document. <p style="text-align:justify"> should not trigger any warning because that's the best way for a WYSIWYG editor to change the appearance of a paragraph. It's a dubious style rule for when the author is in control of the stylesheet, but it's not harmful. In other words, warn only about specific things for which you have something better to propose. Of course, nothing of this belongs in the spec. A conformance checker is free to warn about anything it wants. But systematically warning about style="" is not something I would find useful. Michel Fortin michel.fortin at michelf.com http://www.michelf.com/
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2007 05:50:52 UTC