W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > May 2007

[whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)

From: Adrian Sutton <adrian.sutton@ephox.com>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 17:06:09 +1000
Message-ID: <C25E7581.954%adrian.sutton@ephox.com>
On 2/5/07 4:59 PM, "Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis" <bhawkeslewis at googlemail.com>
wrote:
> Adrian Sutton wrote:
> 
>> That said, by default our editor outputs the span tag version because we
>> like to follow standards and I recommend using our styles menu to apply CSS
>> classes and appropriate structural markup (headings etc). We did however
>> have to go back and add an option to output font tags because of user
>> complaints.
> 
> Why did these user complaints arise? How did the end-users tell the
> difference between the span and font elements?

They had backend systems that didn't support CSS. Like PDF conversion
utilities etc.

> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis

Regards,

Adrian Sutton.
______________________
Adrian Sutton, Integrations Product Manager
Global Direct: +1 (650) 292 9659 x717  Australia: +61 (7) 3858 0118
UK +44 (20) 8123 0617 x717    Mobile +61 (4) 222-36329
Ephox <http://www.ephox.com/>,   Ephox Blogs <http://planet.ephox.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 00:06:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:55 UTC