W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > March 2007

[whatwg] on codecs in a 'video' tag.

From: Martin Atkins <mart@degeneration.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:16:34 +0100
Message-ID: <460D9A52.5060907@degeneration.co.uk>
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> 
> We think your reasons are strong and worthy of respect. That is why we 
> are not trying to force our codec preference on you, but rather propose 
> to leave this issue open. We ask you to respect our reasons as well, 
> rather than trying to force us to go along with your codec preference.
> 

If there is no baseline codec in the specification, I firmly believe 
that one of the following will happen:

  * Everyone will end up implementing whatever Microsoft implements.
  * Microsoft won't implement <video> anyway, so no-one will use it.

In practice, everyone's just mimicking whatever Microsoft does. At least 
when they violate the spec they can be called on it; if what they do is 
allowable by the spec, then everyone will have to copy it or they'll 
have a useless browser.
Received on Friday, 30 March 2007 16:16:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:54 UTC