- From: Gareth Hay <gazhay@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:28:57 +0100
As you carefully cut some of the quoted text, the entire context may not be visible. I suggested that using onload was, as Kristof put it > > more consistent, logical, better style, whatever. because it could be contained in the <head> of the file. the DOMContentLoaded property allows even better usage. as i stated TWICE, it's my opinion, yours clearly differs, i don't see the need to debate coding preferences. Gareth On 29 Mar 2007, at 13:07, Alexey Feldgendler wrote: > On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:07:58 +0200, Gareth Hay <gazhay at gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> What about the DOMContentLoaded event? It is supported by Mozilla >>> and, apparently, Opera 9. Dean Edwards has a technique to make it >>> work on IE, and jQuery supports it on Safari [1]. >>> >>> Is there any chance DOMContentLoaded will be part of HTML5? > >> imho, doing something like this is a much better solution, again >> imho. > > How is this better than putting the <script> immediately beefore </ > body>, which already works today? > > > -- > Alexey Feldgendler <alexey at feldgendler.ru> > [ICQ: 115226275] http://feldgendler.livejournal.com
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2007 07:28:57 UTC