- From: Gareth Hay <gazhay@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:07:58 +0100
+1 imho, doing something like this is a much better solution, again imho. On 29 Mar 2007, at 11:58, Matthias Bauer wrote: > On 29.03.2007 11:33 Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > > On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:30:36 +0200, Gareth Hay <gazhay at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Does it not follow that to be "more consistent, logical, better > style, > >> whatever." you should wrap your code in a function that is > called onload? > >> > >> Isn't that what onload is for? being triggered after the page > has loaded? > > > > That load event dispatched on the <body> element also waits for all > > external scripts and images to be loaded. This is not always > desirable. > > What about the DOMContentLoaded event? It is supported by Mozilla > and, apparently, Opera 9. Dean Edwards has a technique to make it > work on IE, and jQuery supports it on Safari [1]. > > Is there any chance DOMContentLoaded will be part of HTML5? > > -Matt
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2007 04:07:58 UTC