W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > March 2007

[whatwg] on codecs in a 'video' tag.

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 06:40:51 +1000
Message-ID: <2c0e02830703271340n4193a16ei42dcdd672748804f@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Dave,

On 3/28/07, Dave Singer <singer at apple.com> wrote:
> >>  We really feel that the HTML spec. should say no more about video and
> >>  audio formats than it does about image formats (which is merely to give
> >>  examples), and we should strive independently for audio/video
> >>  convergence.  We'd really like to discuss the 'meat' of the proposal --
> >>  the tags, the CSS, and so on!
> >
> >The whole point of the spec is to make sure implementations are
> >compatible.  Just discussing the "meat" and ignoring how things work out
> >in practice may backfire.
> I think the example of SVG (a 'markup' language) having a codec
> requirement that 3GPP then had to explicitly write-out is
> instructive.  The attempt there didn't work.

I would be curious for the reasons that 3GPP has taken the requirement
of vorbis out of the spec. Was that a decision based on technical
reasons and could you please explain what these technical reasons

Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2007 13:40:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:54 UTC