- From: Alexey Feldgendler <alexey@feldgendler.ru>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:16:34 +0200
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:59:14 +0200, Benoit Piette <benoit.piette at gmail.com> wrote: > In the same train of thought, a <document> tag might be useful. I always > found anoying that for many embeded documents (word or pdf) you would have a > second user interface that have similar functionnality to the web browser > (ex: search within a document). Something like <document src="" > type="application/ms-word" />. Having a consistent API and consistent user > interface for an embeded document would be certainly useful. Imagine a > consitent interface (user and API) for an embeded word document, a pdf, or > even an editable content / controls for a CMS, wiki or a blog... Of course, > creating an API that can edit both a PDF and a Word document is something > daunting to say the least... But something that could be useful for simple > content creation (like in a simple CMS, blog or wiki, something that can > actualy generate valid HTML!) and general document embedding for viewing > might be possible. There is <iframe> for this. -- Alexey Feldgendler <alexey at feldgendler.ru> [ICQ: 115226275] http://feldgendler.livejournal.com
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2007 03:16:34 UTC