- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 11:07:13 +0100
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 02:49:11 +0100, Alexey Feldgendler <alexey at feldgendler.ru> wrote: >> I don't really like this element. The name is confusing especially with >> an attribute named src="". It also introduces yet another void element, >> can't we just reuse <param>? The value="" attribute of <param> would >> point to a resource and the type="" attribute (which has been dropped) >> would be added back. I suppose it might be considered overloading, but >> in a way we're just defining how the processing model of a plugin could >> also work... > > If you put it inside <object> fallback content, it will be misunderstood > by the current browsers as pertaining to the <object>. Apart from the fact that I'm not entirely sure about reusing <param> anymore, I don't understand this argument. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Saturday, 24 March 2007 03:07:13 UTC