W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > March 2007

[whatwg] Joe Clark's Criticisms of the WHATWG and HTML 5

From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 01:04:20 +0100
Message-ID: <B8207811-BC21-4E6D-9FCA-02F247ABADE0@crissov.de>
Henri Sivonen:
> On Oct 30, 2006, at 22:33, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> The CSS community has requested a <date> or <time>
>> element because they want to restyle dates and times according to  
>> locale.

Then the recent request to www-style for styling numbers would be  
justified as well. An element for times (or numbers) could have other  
uses, though.

>> One of the reasons for keeping <var>, <cite>, <em>, etc, separate,  
>> instead
>> of saying that authors should just use <i> for all of them, is  
>> that it
>> makes styling them differently much easier.
> Assuming, of course, that you want to style them differently  
> instead of just italicizing all of them.
>> (Why is <i class="var"> better than <var>?)
> It isn't. But <i> is better than <var> for editor UIs if all you  
> want to do is to italicize (the common case).

Isn't this a very western point of view?

PS: (Hyper)Text editors should never have had B, I and U buttons in  
the first place, but now it is an established concept.
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:04:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:54 UTC