- From: Gareth Hay <gazhay@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:07:27 +0000
Ok, I take your point, but I think it is valid to say that I am *a lot* more likely to want to watch video fullscreen than see an image fullscreen, so that is the reasoning behind my thinking, but I do understand that this makes <video> different (special?). Perhaps, if there is a use case for viewing images fullscreen, we can add the ability to the <image> or <img> tag? Gaz On 22 Mar 2007, at 17:00, Gervase Markham wrote: > Gareth Hay wrote: >> I think it should be like this, as you are telling the <video> >> element to go fullscreen and *not* the page. >> That's my opinion. > > I guess that's the heart of it. My view is the opposite. I don't > think video should be special in this regard. > > If you want to see an embedded image full screen, you do "View > Image", then "Full Screen". Why can video not be the same? Of > course, the page should have the option (with the event I > mentioned) of making doing "Full Screen" for the browser Do The > Right Thing with the video, if they think that's what the Right > Thing is. And maybe that would become the norm on video sharing sites. > > Gerv
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2007 10:07:27 UTC