- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:45:11 +0100
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:03:24 +0100, ddailey <ddailey at zoominternet.net> wrote: > As a newcomer to this group, please forgive my ignorance of discussions > that, undoubtedly, have already taken place, but as I have been reading > these threads on <video> and timed media and <object>, a couple of > questions have come to mind: > > 1. why not just include SMIL as a part of HTML, much in the same way > that it is integrated with SVG? It is an existing W3C reco. Reasons for not using <t:video> were that it was 1) complicated and 2) not used. > 2. For content such as XML, MathML, SVG, ChemML... that one would like > to embed in an HTML document could there not be some sort of tag > (<object> was supposed to work, but doesn't in some browsers) like say > > <dom data="some.xml" id="D"> > > for which the DOM associated with the XML content would be easily > accessible through script as with: > > XMLDoc=document.getElementById("D").getXMLDocument. > > It seems as though external things which have DOMs are quite different > that other sorts of media and may deserve their own tag. This use case is already addressed by <object>: <object data=some.xml id=test></object> document.getElementById('test').contentDocument -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2007 05:45:11 UTC