- From: Arve Bersvendsen <arveb@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:40:38 +0100
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 01:08:26 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs at apple.com> wrote: > - We have included a mechanism for static fallback based on container > type and codec, so that it's possible to choose the best video format > for a client even if user agent codec support varies. The covered example in <URL:http://webkit.org/specs/HTML_Timed_Media_Elements.html> is <video src="big_264.mp4" type="video/mp4; codecs=mp4v.21.3"> <video src="medium.mp4" type="video/mp4; codecs=mp4v.20.9"> <img src="small.png" alt="alternate image for non-video browsers" /> </video> </video> What would happen if I did this? <video src="big_264.mp4" type="video/mp4; codecs=mp4v.21.3"> <video src="medium.mp4" type="video/mp4; codecs=mp4v.20.9"> <img src="small.png" alt="alternate image for non-video browsers" /> </video> <img src="small2.png" alt="More alternate text" /> </video> Which fallback is the correct if I can't use either mp4v.21.3 or mp4v.20.9? Do I show one or both fallbacks? What if I can't do 21.3, but can do 20.9, do I show the 21.3. fallback or not? -- Arve Bersvendsen, Web Applications Developer Opera Software ASA, http://www.opera.com/
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2007 03:40:38 UTC