- From: Andrew Sidwell <takkaria@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:48:44 +0000
Gareth Hay wrote: > Huh? Huh? I don't seem to recall stating a preference, just that in my > opinion you have one or the other, but it's hard to justify both. > > So you are advocating the later approach then? dispose of the <object> > tag and just have > <img><video><sound><flash><script><to infinity and beyond> etc? <object> is pretty much now for browser plugins. <video> is for native video, <img> is for native images. <flash> would be a poor choice of something to put in a spec, simply because its use case is already handled by <object>. Pragmatically, there's no problem, especially with the flawed handling of <object> out there. Andrew Sidwell
Received on Friday, 16 March 2007 14:48:44 UTC