W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > March 2007

[whatwg] Video proposals

From: James Justin Harrell <herorev@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <513445.35556.qm@web50111.mail.re2.yahoo.com>

--- Matthew Raymond <mattraymond at earthlink.net> wrote:
 
>    It's all about ease of authoring. If you were new to HTML, would you
> want to do this...
> 
> | <object data="TheEarth.mpeg" type="video/ogg-theora"></object>
> 
> ...Or this...
> 
> | <video src="TheEarth.mpeg"></video>
> 
>    Do you know the MIME type for Ogg Theora? I don't. I made it up. If
> the MIME type on the object listed doesn't say "video" in it, would you
> even know if the <object> element was for a video??? 

The type attribute for object elements is optional if the data attribute is present. That's not
new either - it was also specified that way in HTML 4.01.

Some browsers have not been compliant about it, but people will probably be able to use an object
element without a type attribute without worry before they're able to use a video element without
worry.

There's several good reasons for introducing a video element, but I don't consider easier markup
to be one of them.
Received on Friday, 16 March 2007 12:40:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:53 UTC