- From: Martijn <martijn.martijn@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:59:32 +0100
2007/3/15, Magnus Kristiansen <magnusrk+whatwg at pvv.org>: > > On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:10:33 +0100, Gareth Hay <gazhay at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm not so sure it is a workaround though. > > If you know that the event will bubble, you can make your handler > > prevent bubbling. > > > > I don't think we should be adding two new events to a spec, when the > > existing events can work in the way you want, albeit with a line more > > code. If we did, we'd be forever adding very specialized events. > > You don't seem to understand the situation. Imagine there's a parent > element and several child elements. Every time you mouse over a child > element, a mouseover event triggers (and mouseout on the previous > element). This event bubbles up until it reaches the parent element. An > event handler on the parent can only prevent the events from bubbling > event further (which is not relevant), not from reaching itself. > > To prevent it using bubble cancelling you would have to attach events > stopping bubbling to every child element of the target. Not only is this > an unreliable way of doing it, it also interferes with potential other > elements which actually want bubbling. The other, more practical > workaround is to look at each incoming event and check "did this one come > bubbling up, or does it belong here". However, workarounds do not solve > the problem itself. > > With mouseenter/leave, there is no bubbling. There is no need to attach > handlers to arbitrary elements, and no need to manually check each > incoming event to see if it's bubbling or direct. These events are linked > to a significant enough use case. They are no more redundant than existing > events like click (mousedown+mouseup) and keypress (keydown+keyup). Yeah, I sort of half remembered a situation where I really had a need for mousenter/mouseleave. I got in a similar situation as you describe. I too think mouseenter/mouseleave events would be a useful addition. Regards, Martijn -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20070315/f87b61c4/attachment.htm>
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 12:59:32 UTC