- From: Mihai Sucan <mihai.sucan@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 14:11:01 +0200
Le Sun, 11 Mar 2007 02:45:18 +0200, Alexey Feldgendler <alexey at feldgendler.ru> a ?crit: > Not necessarily. For a long time, Microsoft has been in a position where > they benefit from the lack of interoperability with other browsers. They > had no incentive to make their browser standards-compliant. Now times > have changed, and even Microsoft, as far as I understand, is now willing > to improve their standards compliance. So I don't think that the > standards-mode story will repeat -- this happened before due to browser > wars, where interoperability has been broken intentionally. Yes I understand that, however I am skeptical about Microsoft Internet Explorer. I do not really believe they stopped wanting to dominate the web browsers market, and suddenly they'll just make a good web browser. They will create lockins, traps, and other tricks, to lock beginners in a Microsoftish World Wide Web. Until further proof, I shall maintain my stance. IE 7 is not such proof. It would have been a good start, in 2002-2003. >> Instead of using this DOCTYPE switch, I was even thinking of >> conditional comments, DOM document property, etc. Yet, other methods >> only add complications. If Microsoft considers adding a new rendering >> mode as a must, such that it will not break many sites, then this >> DOCTYPE is an elegant solution. History will repeat itself, no matter >> how elegant the solution might be. > > Conditonal comments and similar approaches solve another kind of > problem: how to allow making pages which do the right thing in good > browsers but still function in older browsers. OTOH, the DOCTYPE switch > allows the browser to do the right thing for good pages without breaking > the old pages. Hence I consider the <!DOCTYPE html> a good and elegant solution for switching to the "strict standards mode" (even if I do not support it). I do not like the other proposals in this thread. -- http://www.robodesign.ro ROBO Design - We bring you the future
Received on Sunday, 11 March 2007 05:11:01 UTC