- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:40:08 +0000
Elliotte Harold wrote: > Problem is safari will handle application/xhtml+xml but seems to be > sending */* so the claim that we should only send application/xhtml+xml > to browsers that explicitly request that type is problematic. When I talked to WebKit developers about this, it seemed they considered their support for real XHTML less reliable than their support for HTML at that point. So while Safari's Accept header may be suboptimal, there's nothing terribly wrong with interpreting it the same as IE and serving it HTML instead. -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2007 16:40:08 UTC