W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > March 2007

[whatwg] <base> versus xml:base

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:14:27 +0100
Message-ID: <op.toqimdad64w2qv@id-c0020.driveway.uu.nl>
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:07:03 +0100, Keryx Web <webmaster at keryx.se> wrote:
> It may be that I've implemented this in the wrong way - corrections are  
> welcome - but it seems to me that even though <xml:base> is legal today,  
> it is **not** supported by UAs. Which makes Anne's proposal, that <base>  
> should be allowed in both serializations, even more important.

There's nu such thing as an xml:base element. It's an attribute. And it is  
supported although there may be some "bugs" with dynamic changes etc.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 5 March 2007 13:14:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:53 UTC