W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > March 2007

[whatwg] <video> element proposal

From: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 13:09:23 +0000
Message-ID: <B20F380C-52B0-465B-9110-E590EDD79CC6@googlemail.com>

On 1 Mar 2007, at 05:27, Shadow2531 wrote:

> On 2/28/07, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at opera.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Opera has some internal expiremental builds with an implementation  
>> of a
>> <video> element. The element exposes a simple API (for the moment)  
>> much
>> like the Audio() object:
> I think it'd be cool if the video element *just* supported theora.

Why limit yourself to one format? Very, very, very few specifications  
limit the format so strictly, and with good reason: WA1 won't  
actually be a standard until the next decade, if not the one after  
that, and in that time, there will easily be _far_ more efficient  
codecs created. We could just say we only support theora, then add on  
others later, but why when having multiple options not allow anything  
to start with?

- Geoffrey Sneddon
Received on Saturday, 3 March 2007 05:09:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:53 UTC