W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2007

[whatwg] Entity parsing [trema/diaresis vs umlaut]

From: Sander <html5@zoid.nl>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:48:22 +0200
Message-ID: <46800DF6.1080508@zoid.nl>

K?i?tof ?elechovski schreef:
> Could I have an example of &otrema; please?  Something along the lines of
> zo?logy, but actually required?  Not that I doubt your knowledge of Dutch
> but I would like to have it as a demonstration.
> Chris
>   
co?rdinaten


BTW: neither of the quotes below are mine ;-)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org
> [mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Oistein E. Andersen
> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 11:28 PM
> To: whatwg at whatwg.org
> Subject: Re: [whatwg] Entity parsing [trema/diaresis vs umlaut]
>
> Sander wrote:
>
>   
>> Only the vowel U can have either
>>     
>
> This is not quite right. All Latin vowels (a, e, i, o, u, y) can take the
> trema/diaresis
> (?, ?, i, ?, ? in Dutch; ?, i, ?*, y** in French), and a, o, u can all be
> umlauted (?, ?, ?
> in German).
>
>
>
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20070625/308e9e23/attachment.htm>
Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 11:48:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:56 UTC