W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2007

[whatwg] Use-cases for <head><noscript> (was: <noscript> should be allowed in <head>)

From: Simon Pieters <zcorpan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:44:22 +0200
Message-ID: <op.tt90j8b07a8kvn@hp-a0a83fcd39d2>
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:59:18 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:

>> If we want to allow NOSCRIPT in HEAD, then it seems to me that the most
>> logical way to parse non-HEAD content inside it (which would be a parse
>> error) is to pop the NOSCRIPT element and then reprocess as if it was
>> found in HEAD directly.
>
> That's what I did (though I did it for some head content too; let me
> know if you think there are use cases for the other cases).

I can think of meta refresh as being potentially useful (e.g., if you want  
a news page to update itself, but with XHR if scripting is enabled, or  
something).

-- 
Simon Pieters
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2007 07:44:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:56 UTC