- From: Simon Pieters <zcorpan@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:47:22 +0200
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:24:31 +0200, Thomas Broyer <t.broyer at gmail.com> wrote: >> "<" in unquoted attribute values works interoperably. No need to make >> it a >> parse error in the attribute value (unquoted) state. > > This doesn't mean it should be conforming either (actually, it's > entirely orthogonal). Right. > Parse errors are for conformance checkers, and I > believe those should report "<" in unquoted attribute values as > errors. Why? It doesn't create any problem as far as parsing goes in legacy UAs. -- Simon Pieters
Received on Monday, 18 June 2007 02:47:22 UTC