W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2007

[whatwg] Entity parsing

From: Křištof Želechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:51:53 +0200
Message-ID: <000001c7af32$d1a16770$1a01080a@POCZTOWIEC>
Aside: I know that it can be changed but "iuml" is a very unfortunate name
for "i tr?ma".  How about deprecating "iuml" in favor of "itrema"?
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org
[mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Simon Pieters
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 8:49 AM
To: Ian Hickson; Oistein E. Andersen
Cc: whatwg at whatwg.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Entity parsing

On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 03:05:05 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:

> On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, ?istein E. Andersen wrote:
>>
>> From section 9.2.3.1. Tokenising entities:
>> >  For some entities, UAs require a semicolon, for others they don't.
>>
>> This applies to IE.
>>
>> FWIW, the entities not requiring a semicolon are the ones encoding
>> Latin-1 characters, the other HTML 3.2 entities (&amp, &gt and &lt), as
>> well as &quot and the uppercase variants (&AMP, &COPY, &GT, &LT, &QUOT
>> and &REG). [...]
>
> I've defined the parsing and conformance requirements in a way that
> matches IE. As a side-effect, this has made things like "na&iumlve"
> actually conforming. I don't know if we want this.

Firefox, Opera and Safari treat "na&iumlve" as equivalent to  
"na&amp;iumlve". So for compat with them, the semicolon should be made  
required.

-- 
Simon Pieters
Received on Friday, 15 June 2007 02:51:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:56 UTC