- From: Aaron Boodman <boogs@youngpup.net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:43:45 -0700
Before we get too buried in specifics, I wanted to take the discussion up a level and talk about Gears' overall goals and see where, if anywhere, they differ from the rest of the community's. If we can agree on the goals, then I'm confident that with this groups we ought to be able to come up with a clean implementation. The Gears' teams goals for LocalServer were: * To support seamless (non-modal) transitions between online, offline, and the browser-is-confused-and-thinks-you're-online-but-really-you're-not (wireless that you have to login to, slow DNS, and crashed servers that are serving 500s are all good examples of this last situation). * To allow users to access the application from the same URL whether they are online or offline. * To support atomic updates of applications so that you always have a consistent version when you go offline. * To allow the capture of arbitrary URLs. The canonical example would be attachments in web mail. * To allow the capture of file uploads for later re-posting to the server. Again, think web mail. * Good, webby, autoupdating characteristics. We didn't want it to be possible for web developers to push a broken version of their app which could never get unbroken. In fact, we would love this to be as close to webby as possible, without sacrificing the goal of always being in a consistent state. * Simple enough to use without sophisticated server-side infrastructure (again, you can think of this as webbiness -- we want developers to be able to author this with Notepad). * To make it as simple as possible to migrate existing AJAX applications to be offline-enabled. - One major issue that we found here was that lots of existing applications serve different resources at the same URI depending on who is logged in. We could ask these applications to redesign so that they don't do that, but we would prefer to not have to. Some of our APIs probably pretty naturally fall out of this list of goals. Others, not so much. Those others may be things that are ripe for re-evaluation, and we are happy (eager, even) to do this. We want this to be tight, happy, loved, and well-used. - a
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 09:43:45 UTC