- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:55:50 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Olav Junker Kj?r wrote: > > Generally, I think its a very good thing that the spec tries to define > how to handle invalid HTML. Undefined and optional behavior in > interpreting HTML is bad thing IMHO. > > Maybe the rules for parsing invalid HTML (in HTML5) could be > generalized, something like: [...] Since we now have very specific parsing rules, this probably no longer really applies. Please let me know if you disagree with what the spec says today about handling invalid HTML (and <option> elements in particular). -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2007 15:55:50 UTC