- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 17:17:30 +0100
* Anne van Kesteren wrote: >On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:20:48 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile ><chaals at opera.com> wrote: >> One of the sources of complexity in RDF syntax is the requirement that >> it could be included in HTML documents in a way that didn't upset legacy >> browsers. There are assorted use cases for being able to include RDF >> inside documents. > >I think Henri was asking about XHTML5 documents. So legacy doesn't really >matter there. If you put it inside <head> it won't be displayed. (As >opposed to HTML5, where it would imply a <body> start tag and where you >don't have namespaces in the markup anyway.) Charles is saying, RDF/XML syntax is complex now because compatibility with legacy browsers was a concern back when RDF/XML was being defined. -- Bj?rn H?hrmann ? mailto:bjoern at hoehrmann.de ? http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 ? Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 ? http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim ? PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 ? http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Sunday, 25 February 2007 08:17:30 UTC