- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:51:46 +1100
Matthew Raymond wrote: > I've been pondering a use for the <m> element, and I agree that the > highlighting sematics make the name "hi" a better choice. I strongly disagree. I think it should remain as <m> or, if people really object to using a single letter name (though I don't understand why), then <mark> (or similar) would be acceptable. > | <blockquote> > | XForms is a W3C recommendation. > | <hi by="Matthew Raymond" title="This comment has no logical basis."> > | XForms Tiny is does not conflict with XForms, but WF2 does.</hi> > | </blockquote> Interesting. The concept of specifying who added a particular mark using the |by| attribute could be useful for collaborative editing/reviewing. The GPLv3 draft comment page might be a good use case for such a thing, but it also has comments a lot more complex than could be done with the title attribute. http://gplv3.fsf.org/comments/gplv3-draft-2.html I somewhat like the idea of the |by| attribute being a human readable name; although, perhaps we would need the cite attribute as well to link to a page about the reviewer. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/
Received on Sunday, 18 February 2007 12:51:46 UTC