W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2007

[whatwg] W3C compatibility

From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:20:50 +0000
Message-ID: <1171290050.7386.180.camel@galahad>
David Latapie wrote:

> The rationale was that the difference between <abbr> and <acronym> is 
> presentational. 

Hmm. Maybe it could be described as presentational, I'm not sure. I
thought the rationale was authors don't understand what acronyms are
because Miriam-Webster's definition is so misleading. <duck/>

> Consequently, what about a microformat?


<span class="ex-acronym">CERN</span>
<abbr title="Federal Bureau of Investigation"
<abbr title="National Aeronautics and Space Administration"
<abbr title="Lieutenant" class="contraction">Leut.</abbr>

Any others?

Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Monday, 12 February 2007 06:20:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:52 UTC