- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:44:23 +0200
On Feb 12, 2007, at 14:09, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote: >> The practical alternative is to refuse to implement specs that >> require legacy-incompatible changes to processing models. > > For browsers which have already implemented XHTML1, that seems to > require implementing neither XHTML2-in-the-XHTML1-namespace nor XHTML5 > (cf. Anne's reply). What's there in XHTML5 that would require breaking XHTML1 support (in practice, predefined class names don't break practice)? -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen at iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Monday, 12 February 2007 05:44:23 UTC