- From: Jonathan Worent <jworent@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:03:40 -0800 (PST)
--- Henri Sivonen <hsivonen at iki.fi> wrote: > On Feb 9, 2007, at 19:46, Jonathan Worent wrote: > > > There are plenty of elements in the spec right > > now that aren't likely to be used often, but they're still in the > > spec because they have merit. > > Actually, there are elements that don't have much merit (e.g. > <samp>), but trying to pretend that they don't exist and aren't > interoperably presented isn't worth the trouble. What I was trying to say is that it will be impossible to predict an elements usage. Using that as a gauge to determine if something will or won't be added to the spec isn't a fair argument. > > -- > Henri Sivonen > hsivonen at iki.fi > http://hsivonen.iki.fi/ > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never Miss an Email Stay connected with Yahoo! Mail on your mobile. Get started! http://mobile.yahoo.com/services?promote=mail
Received on Sunday, 11 February 2007 15:03:40 UTC