- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 11:21:39 +1100
David Latapie wrote: > On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:36:25 +1100, Lachlan Hunt wrote: >> <m> marks a point of interest for future reference, it does not >> denote importance. Everyone seems to be focussing on the definition >> of highlight meaning emphasis as their argument that it is the same >> as <em> and/or <strong>. However, it's the definition of mark [1], >> in particular "to identify an item for future reference", that is >> most relevant, and neither <em> nor <strong> fulfil that purpose. > > Of Google cache highlighting has anything to do with future reference? > Or is the Google cache highlighting example a wrong one? What? I'm not sure I understand, but I think your putting too much emphasis on the word "future". The google cache highlights the word as a reference for the user, which is exactly what this element is for. It doesn't matter whether the user looks at it immediately, in 5 minutes, tomorrow, or in the distant future; it's there for when the user needs it. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/
Received on Friday, 9 February 2007 16:21:39 UTC