- From: David Walbert <dwalbert@learnnc.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:53:10 -0500
On Feb 9, 2007, at 11:36 AM, Michel Fortin wrote: > However, I believe that what some means here by de-emphasising > something is that they want to *emphasize the unimportance* of what > they're saying. Yes, that's a good point. > If an element is introduced however, maybe <pointless> would be a > better name, less abstract and harder to misuse than anything > derived from "de-emphasis". Indeed! Most of the content on the web could be wrapped in <pointless> tags, and it would save me a lot of time... :-) _____ David Walbert LEARN NC, UNC-Chapel Hill dwalbert at learnnc.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20070209/768cedd1/attachment.htm>
Received on Friday, 9 February 2007 08:53:10 UTC