- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 15:51:13 +0000
Nicholas Shanks wrote: > Yes, like it, but with a different name. A nicer name than IMG. One > with three vowels. One that only accepts image/* content types. One > with a more specific usage that can be controlled independently of > OBJECT through CSS 1/2. Strictly, you don't really need a second element for independent selection. CSS 2: object[type="image/jpeg"], object[type="image/gif"] Draft CSS 3: object[type^="image/"] -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Friday, 9 February 2007 07:51:13 UTC