- From: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:53:06 +0100
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:42:58 +0100, Jorgen Horstink wrote: > I totally agree. But then I would suggest to use some sort of title > element. But that would not make sense because it conflicts with Hx. > But if we want something like LH for lists, the question is; aren't > there other elements which can use some sort of caption/title/header? I agree. For images, I use a definition list dd = image dt = description (in that order, since I want a bottom "caption") > But to be honest, this looks silly to me too. My main concern is; > does a LH attribute cover the entire problem of 'heading' some > element, or is another mechanism needed to solve the issue if the > problem is broader? Your binding idea is great. I don't know much about binding (does the new BeCSS draft at W3C has anything to do with that?). I'm deeply interested in following this discussion. -- </david_latapie> U+0F00 http://blog.empyree.org/en (English) http://blog.empyree.org/fr (Fran?ais) http://blog.empyree.org/sl (Slovensko)
Received on Friday, 9 February 2007 04:53:06 UTC