- From: Nicholas Shanks <contact@nickshanks.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:09:24 +0000
So there have been a number of complaints that the only way to de- emphasize something is via <small>. I am one such complaining voice. There have been several suggested solutions proposed too. I would like to give my opinions on a few of those: <em level="-1"> or similar attribute My concern here is whether this is supposed to be an absolute or relative value. Would <em level="3"><em level="-1">this</em></em> result in an emphasis level of 2 (relative) or ?1 (absolute). What would level="+3" mean? <de-em>, <de-emph>, <subdue> or other new element I think a new element would be better, but the English language seems to lack an antonym for "emphasis". http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/emphasis http://www.synonym.com/antonym/emphasis Short of proposing a new word (?antiphasis" ?) and deriving an element from that I'm not sure there's anything that would be suitable. Antiphasizing: the act of coughing over or mumbling something you say when you don't want others to hear it. ;-) Repurposing an existing element I don't think there's anything that would be suitable. Using <small> would give the wrong impression to HTML authors. Does anyone else have better ideas? - Nicholas. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2157 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20070208/a0cdd1c2/attachment.bin>
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 11:09:24 UTC