- From: Nicholas Shanks <contact@nickshanks.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 17:36:47 +0000
On 8 Feb 2007, at 15:23, Leons Petrazickis wrote: > In the Western world, the standard for highlighting is a neon yellow > background. I submit that a much better name for <m> is <hi> > (<hilite>, <highlite>, <highlight>). I don't like the look of "<hi>" ? it doesn't tell me what it does very well. Maybe it stands for Horizontal Italic, or is some kind of markup greeting element: File: <hi> Browser: <hi> File: <i have some html for you> Browser: <cool> It seems to impart too much of a visual origin too. Like <b> and<i> did. I still think <mark> would be better. It's short enough not to be annoying, and long enough to be self explanatory. > People don't necessarily mark > text much -- if anything, "mark" implies underlining, circling, > drawing arrows... ...or highlighting with a fluorescent marker pen! > The default styling of <hi> would be a neon yellow background. > Google's choice of #ffff66 could well be suitable. If you set the background colour you MUST set the foreground colour too! mark { background-color: #FF6; color: black; } - Nicholas. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2157 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20070208/83fc84eb/attachment.bin>
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 09:36:47 UTC