W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2007

[whatwg] The m element [em and strong]

From: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:21:21 +0100
Message-ID: <20070208152121136673.1835dff9@empyree.org>
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 13:35:12 +0100, ?istein E. Andersen wrote:
> On 8 Feb 2007, at 9:42AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> "importance" is differen[t] from "emphasis".
> This is indeed what the current version of the specification says, 
> but I honestly
> think this distinction is too artificial to work in practice.

ditto, but I'm open to/welcoming arguments

> More importantly, emphasis is customarily used to convey importance, 
> which implies
> that the two concepts cannot be dissociated in HTML5 without causing 
> confusion.

Do you mean than focus is another subset of emphasis?

> The Wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emphasis_(typography)
> is also relevant to the more general em/strong/m/b/i discussion, as 
> it clearly
> defines any change in font style as a kind of emphasis.

As a reminder: not only font-style, but also voice: 
voice-stress:moderate and voice-stress:strong also apply.

An example where there is emphasis without importance is the 
?highlighting? of foreign words (at least in French, please someone 
confirm for English):

/Conquistadores/ were wearing /morri?n/
<span xml:lang="es">Conquistadores</span> were wearing <em>morri?ns<em>

(for the sake of simplicity, let's assume we wanted to emphasize the 
name of the helmet)

Conquistadores: foreign word, italic
Morri?n:        important,    italic

Can we say that both words are emphasized? Or only "morri?n"?
</david_latapie>             U+0F00
http://blog.empyree.org/en (English)
http://blog.empyree.org/fr (Fran?ais)
http://blog.empyree.org/sl (Slovensko)
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 06:21:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:52 UTC