W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2007

[whatwg] The m element

From: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:14:16 +0100
Message-ID: <20070208141416837588.08437b53@empyree.org>
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 07:59:44 -0500, David Walbert wrote:

> I would be less concerned that it's a single letter than that "m" and 
> "em" are pronounced identically (in English, and in the other 
> European languages I can think of offhand) -- which would be 
> confusing if one were trying to explain them aloud, especially given 
> how close they are semantically.

On the top of my head
	m [em]
	em [i.em]

	m [?m]
	em [?.?m]

	m [eme]
	em [e.eme]

	m [me]
	em [e.me]

Not much problem there (I still am cautious about using single-letter 
elements, just making a point)
</david_latapie>             U+0F00
http://blog.empyree.org/en (English)
http://blog.empyree.org/fr (Fran?ais)
http://blog.empyree.org/sl (Slovensko)
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 05:14:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:52 UTC